Tuesday, August 29, 2006

shamanic times

I subscribe to the Weekly World News. It provides no end of amusement, and I tend to agree with Tommy Lee Jones’s character in Men In Black that it’s the most reliable newspaper in the world. With it’s in depth articles on such things as the stairway to heaven collapsing, and its steady coverage on Elvis sightings, it keeps me well updated on the common bizarreness of planet earth. I consider it a kind of “Shamanic Times”. This week, with the demotion of Pluto as a planet, the news can’t be much weirder. I’m waiting to see what the Weekly World News will make of it.

Pluto is the God of the Underworld, of all that lies below the surface. All the qualities of the god have also been ascribed to the now demoted planet. In Astrology, the energies of Pluto are transforming, as Pluto is the energy of the subconscious, which is the dirt and ground our actions take root in. Pluto is also associated with renewal and rebirth. It represents endings and new beginnings, as well as spiritual growth and rebirth. The shadow side of Pluto is an obsessive desire for power and control and general destructiveness. Pluto packs a punch, depending where it lies in your astrological chart. My friend Reya, a creative astrologer, shook up some of my old patterns by fiddling with the placement of Pluto in my chart. Does what she did still hold now that Pluto is no longer a planet?

What can it possibly mean that Pluto is getting the boot as a planet? What will this do to our astrological view of the world, a view which runs deep and feeds our mytho-poetic souls? How will this affect our destiny? Several months back the Catholic Church decided that Limbo was closed. More and more people had become uncomfortable with the idea/fact that in Catholic reality if a baby dies and is unbaptized, it goes to Limbo. So, instead of negotiating with God (maybe something us pagans are more comfortable with?) to relax the rules and let all the babies in Limbo out, the guys in charge of the Catholic Church pronounced that Limbo no longer exists. It’s just gone. This boggles this witch’s mind. I'm no Catholic, but since I first heard about this, I've been keenly aware of just how many times I and others invoke Limbo. The first week it was gone, at least three clients talked about being or feeling in Limbo. They were startled when I informed them Limbo was gone. Can both Pluto and Limbo really be erased from the collective consciousness? What does this do to our everyday reality? There’s now no Limbo and Pluto is not a planet. What’s next? Enquiring minds want to know.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I have to do this...you are a trip and make me laugh out loud. Whole lot of (great) bloggin' going on.....

steward said...

"Pluto is the God of the Underworld, of all that lies below the surface. All the qualities of the god have also been ascribed to the now demoted planet."

Obviously a Bush administration plot. It goes along with the idea of his abolishing the War Crimes statutes. If there's no War Crimes, he won't go to jail, and if there's no hell, he won't go there either. ;>

steward said...

"the guys in charge of the Catholic Church pronounced that Limbo no longer exists."

It never -did- exist, at least doctrinally. It was just an attempt by a lot of priests to console parents of unbaptized babies, and even the current Catholic Principles of Un..., er, I mean, Catechism of the Catholic Church, is vague on its belief in what happens to unbaptized persons who die before reaching a state of mens rea. Just another example of what happens when religious groups let their definitions get out of control.

The word 'limbo' as used in ordinary conversation has never really seemed to me (speaking as a former Catholic lay evangelist) to match the description of "limbo" by some priests; "Catholic limbo" has never even been unofficially that form of stasis. I think what the word limbo, as in "that's in limbo" - i.e., nothing's happening - is much closer to the concept of "no wind" in Buddhism.

-----

"There is an old, old story about a theologian who was asked to reconcile the Doctrine of Divine Mercy with the doctrine of infant damnation. 'The Almighty,' he explained, 'finds it necessary to do things in His official and public capacity which in His private and personal capacity He deplores." [Robert A. Heinlein (1907 - 1988) Methuselah's Children]

Reya Mellicker said...

I didn't remove Pluto from your chart. I jumped the gun before the astronomers, recognizing that there is a whole belt of Pluto-like objects, and simply added a second one to your chart. Simply? It isn't simple.

Yarrow points out to me that Ceres has also been added as a new planet. That's the biggest asteroid which was once named a planet, then demoted, now promoted again. Great to have mother Demeter out there, and a whole belt of possible Fates way out at the edges of the solar system.

I like the new set up.

Anonymous said...

We live in paradigm-shifting times. As far as I'm concerned, I want my planet back - Pluto remains a planet for many people, not least of all a majority of astronomers who were not present for the unrepresentative vote and are now campaigning for a re-vote. So the story ain't over yet... x

Anonymous said...

Congrats on winning a Spicy, hon! It was well deserved for that Elvis article you wrote. I didn't expect to have so much fun judging the entries!

x